University Lecturers Refusing To Endorse EC’s New Register

University Lecturers  Refusing To Endorse  EC’s New Register University Lecturers Refusing To Endorse EC’s New Register

The Herald, has picked intelligence that the New Patriotic Party (NPP) is organizing lecturers of some tertiary institutions across the country to issue a counter statement in the Electoral Commission’s (EC) decision to compile a new voters’ register for the upcoming elections which is less than five months away.

This paper learnt that, the lecturers are being organized by a lecturer of the Political Science Department of University of Ghana, Legon.

Dr. Isaac Owusu-Mensah’s moves, are said to be in response to the recent statement issue by a group calling itself the Concerned University Lecturers of Ghana, which this week kicked against the decision of the EC to compile a new voters’ register.

The Herald is informed that, Dr. Owusu-Mensah’s has not been greeted with the kind of enthusiasm he had expected. Most of his colleagues are refusing to side with his demand to have them support the EC.

Dr. Owusu-Mensah is reported to be the brain behind polls churn out in the name of the University of Ghana, which often predicted the NPP and President Akufo-Addo as winning the 2020 election.

He is said to be a bosom friend of the current Deputy Chairman of EC; Dr. Bossman Asare, who until his appointment was the head of the Political Science Department.

Sources close to him had this to say about him “Dr. Owusu Mensah, is as a known NPP guy who runs their bogus opinion polls from the Department of Political science. He and Dr. Bossman Asare use to do those polls align to the NPP. That gained Dr. Bossman Asare his EC job.

Following the letter to the EC by a group of Professors from the various universities in Ghana, Owusu Mensah, has been calling lecturers he knows as sympathizers of the NPP to ask them to sign another letter to the EC in defence of the stance taken by the EC on the voters register.

A source close to Dr. Owusu Mensah, says most lectures surprisingly support the letter written by the 100 Professors and made it clear that they will not support his counter letter agenda”.

On Monday, June 8, 2020, over 100 lecturers from various universities across the country, in an open letter said the EC boss’ entrenched position to exclude the current Voters’ ID card from the list of documents needed to secure a new ID card during the compilation of the new register could end up disenfranchising over 9 million Ghanaians.

The letter also stated that the posture of the EC boss, has poisoned the electoral environment and has the potential to completely erode the trust and confidence of the Commission.

“It is our considered view that the Commission under your leadership seem to have
thrown away the principle of constructive deliberation and consensus-building, and
that to a very large extent has accounted for the current controversy.

“Your current unilateral departure from the previous approach to decision making by the Commission has poisoned the electoral environment and has the potential to undermine the credibility of the 2020 elections.”

Below is the full letter to the EC Chairperson

Dear Madam,

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF GHANA: ERR ON THE SIDE OF CAUTION

We the undersigned lecturers and staff from the various Universities in Ghana bring you fraternal greetings, and wish you and your team well in the performance of your duties in anticipation of a free, fair and transparent Presidential and Parliamentary elections in December 2020.

This letter is necessitated by our concern for free, fair, and transparent elections and the need to ensure that events leading to, during, and after the elections conform to best and widely accepted practices in electoral management.

In the last several months, we have observed with utmost concern that public conversations on matters relating to the impending 2020 elections have been characterized by a series of controversies that have the potential to completely erode the trust and confidence the Electoral Commission has jealously guarded over more than a quarter of a century since ushering in our new political dispensation.

Experience has shown that our country’s success at previous elections was driven by the Commission’s ability to nurture an environment of constructive deliberations that provide a voice for political parties and other stakeholders to discuss, work through compromises, and build consensus on accepted rules of engagement.

It is our considered view that the Commission under your leadership seem to have thrown away the principle of constructive deliberation and consensus-building, and that to a very large extent has accounted for the current controversy.

We are mindful of your constitutionally guaranteed independence but, we are also aware that the exercise of that independence over the years has been cognizant of the Commission’s inter-dependent relationship with the political parties, other stakeholders and the citizenry at large.

Your current unilateral departure from the previous approach to decision making by the Commission has poisoned the electoral environment and has the potential to undermine the credibility of the 2020 elections.

We are particularly worried about the decision to compile completely new voters’ register given that our country’s constitutionally scheduled Presidential and Parliamentary elections are about six months away. The decision is puzzling for a number of reasons.

1. The existing register has been used by your office to conduct the following:
i. 2012 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections
ii. 2016 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections
iii. A Referendum to create six (6) new administrative Regions in 2018
iv. A By-election at the Ayawaso West Wuogon Constituency, and
v. District Assembly Elections in 2019

So far, we have not seen any evidence to suggest that an updated version of the existing register cannot perform same role in 2020 Presidential and Parliamentary elections, as the outcomes of these elections have been
described by your office and other stakeholders as some of the most credible elections in our country’s history.

2. We are worried about the international image of our country and wish to draw your attention to the negative effects of your decision to compile a new voters’ register, as that conduct will violate Section II Article 2 (1) of Protocol A/SP1/12/01 on Democracy and Good Governance Supplementary to the Protocol relating to the Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, Resolution, Peacekeeping and Security, which forbids ECOWAS member nations from making any extensive changes to electoral regimes in the last six (6) months before elections.

3. In the wake of the outbreak of COVID-19, there is the likelihood that any process of voter registration will defeat the principles of social distancing and compromise the health of many citizens. Our nation is already compelled to shoulder unexpected financial burdens arising from the outbreak of the pandemic, and it will be an act of wisdom not engage in activities that will exacerbate that burden. Nothing should take precedence over healthy human lives, and so it is our considered view that existing voters register is updated as was done prior to both the recent referendum and District Assembly elections to pave the way for first-time voters to exercise their rights
to participate in the electoral processes.

4. While we are happy to support the Electoral Commission in coming up with solutions to clearly defined problems, we are still unclear as to the specific problems and challenges the decision to compile new voters register is intended to solve. Although a new register as your plan cannot be possible given the proximity to our scheduled elections, we implore your office to provide evidence of the specific challenges it seeks to address with the register and we are happy to participate in constructive deliberations to assist your office with alternative policy options that will enhance our electoral credibility.

In addition to our concerns about the compilation of a new voters’ register, we are even more worried about your decision to limit registration eligibility requirements to passports and Ghanacards. We are unable to understand why you seem to have lost confidence in voters’ identity cards issued by your office and rather gained
confidence in uncompleted Ghanacard operations being undertaken by the National Identification Authority (NIA).

Given that the NIA has itself admitted that its work cannot be completed till September 2020, we fear that your insistence on using the Ghanacard card will disenfranchise millions of Ghanaians. We are aware that the NIA currently registers persons fifteen (15) years and above and that can introduce underage persons into the register. Passports are a privilege in Ghana and only about two million Ghanaians (6.7% of the population) possess them, and it is possible that most holders of passports are also holders of Ghanacards.

Taken together, holders of passports and Ghanacards will be approximately nine million citizens. If the registration requirement is limited to these two documents, you risk denying about nine million Ghanaians the right to vote in December 2020.

Similarly, we are deeply concerned that if you proceed with your decision to exclude the existing voters’ identity card from the primary documents required for the registration, you will open the Commission up to avoidable multiple legal challenges especially from holders of the existing voters’ identity card who may feel their citizenship rights are threatened by your decision. It is important to keep in mind that millions of Ghanaians have never bothered to acquire passports because its acquisition has never been made mandatory for citizens, and often, it is perceived as a document that is necessary only when one has plans to travel abroad.

It is therefore essential that the Commission acts in a manner that does not penalize some of our fellow citizens for their inability to possess documents for which until now, they have no reason to acquire. It is our considered view that although the Commission is mandated to register citizens for election purposes, the determination of who qualifies as a citizen of Ghana with voting rights falls outside its domain, hence the need to exercise extreme caution so as not to violate important constitutional provisions.

We have taken note of the window you provided for those without the passports and Ghanacards to register if they are able to obtain guarantees from two registered voters. We are worried that this window is a recipe for disaster, as it will provide an entry point for several foreign nationals and underage persons to register.

Respectfully, that window is also absurd as it makes a mockery of the sacred principles of citizenship itself, especially because it will give rise in some instances to people having to vouch for the citizenship of their biological parents simply on accounts of the latter not having the prescribed documents. It is important to note that a person’s citizenship and the rights inherent are alienable and cannot be taken away simply because he or she does not possess a specific piece of paper.

Given that your new eligibility requirements will make millions of Ghanaians ineligible to register and vote, we are worried about the adverse implications of that for the the legitimacy of recently elected Assembly Members, the President of Ghana, and the Members of the Legislature whose mandate is held on accounts of some of the
persons likely to be disenfranchised by your decision.

We wish to urge you to revisit the processes involved in the compilation of the existing Biometric Voters’ Register leading to the 2012 elections. In that process, all the political parties and other stakeholders were actively involved in decisions leading to the compilation, and everyone had adequate opportunity to make inputs. Entrenched positions were relaxed and compromise evolved.

The process was free from political manipulation or intimidation and therefore provided all eligible persons the necessary and required environment to be captured in the biometric voters’ register. The biometric process itself was designed to ensure that only eligible voters whose bio-data was captured could be on the voters’ register.

Overall, the high integrity of the process of registration makes the current register, without doubt, one of the fairest, most credible, and fit for purpose. Please be reminded that current President Nana Akufo Addo and the Members of Parliament were elected into office with the existing biometric register.

Finally, we wish to urge you to act as a referee without any sign or acts of partiality. It is necessary for all stakeholders especially the political parties to go into the election without harbouring suspicion about your neutrality as the referee primarily because such a feeling is dangerous to the integrity and acceptability of the outcome, and the stability of our country.

We are aware, that beautiful games have been marred by poor officiating, a domain you should avoid. It is our belief that a return to constructive deliberation is the surest way for developing a consensus and collective position in the interest of our country. Electoral disputes have resulted in the loss of millions of lives in other countries in the sub-region, and the lesson therein for us is to avoid belligerent decisions and intransigent and bellicose positions.

Please feel free to contact Professor Kodzo Gavua on 020-813-0581; Professor Anthony M. Sallar on 054-315-4128; Dr. Nana Ama Brown-Klutse 024-498-3637 or via the following email address [email protected] if you need further clarification.

Yours Sincerely,
______signed_____

Source: theheraldghana.com